Mark Twain is famously quoted as saying , “There are lies, damn lies and statistics,” but he, in fact, attributed the saying to Benjamin Disraeli. It highlights the difficulty about using statistics because the figures can be distorted to provide evidence for the point of order being argued.
When it comes to the victims of Domestic Violence, you will encounter various statistics: 1 in 4 women will be a victim, 1 in 6 men will be a victim, even 95 % of all victims will be female ( I STRONGLY dispute this as you shall see).
The problem is that all statistics are based on samples, and some of the samples used were already quite restrictive in the profile of people interviewed and the questions or options given. In other words, the results had already been determined and the questionnaires had been designed to provide the required outcomes.
The figures I present come from the latest statistics available complied from the UK’s Office for National Statistics: Crime Survey (Focus on Violent Crime and Sexual Offences, 2011/12
This is perhaps the most conclusive set of data available but is conveniently ignored by Misandrists to want to promote a different message. The sample used for the following figures comprised of 5,129 men and 5,991 women.
The Survey shows that
- 40% of domestic abuse victims are male: for every five victims, three will be female, two will be male.
- 7% of women and 5% of men were estimated to have experienced any domestic abuse in the last year, equivalent to an estimated 1.2 million female and 800,000 male victims.
- 31% (one in four – not quite one in three) of women and 18% (one in six) of men had experienced any domestic abuse since the age of 16. These figures were equivalent to an estimated 5.0 million female victims of domestic abuse and 2.9 million male victims.
So, to recap, based on the latest data set available and taken from a pool of 11,220 people (46 % male 54 % female), 1 in 4 women and 1 in 6 men will experience Domestic Violence in their lifetime and 40% of domestic abuse victims are male therefore 60% are female.
I felt led to write this because I came across an article which made the following claims:
“The reality, however, as indicated by Women’s Aid statistics, is that a quarter of British women suffer domestic abuse; many of them experience repeated violence. According to the charity, on average a woman has been assaulted 35 times before she is able to seek help. A perpetrator doesn’t necessarily only cause physical or sexual harm, but may also be psychologically, spiritually, emotionally or financially abusive.
And what about abuse directed against men? Although this does occur in the UK, Women’s Aid says that 95% of the victims of domestic abuse are female.”
I did contact the author to challenge the claims reportedly made by Women’s Aid. From the information I presented, there is a clear discrepancy. …can both set of figures be correct?
Perhaps the biggest clue is in the name of the charity. It’s not Aid to Victims of Domestic Abuse, it’s WOMEN’S aid. It is not in the charity’s aims or best interests to acknowledge male victims in any shape or form.
Looking at the Women’s Aid website is most enlightening about the misinformation against Men that they are spreading. The sad thing is that many who accept at face value that Women’s Aid must be the leading voice on all domestic abuse matters fail to see the true motive of the charity .
…1 in 4 women will be a victim of domestic violence in their lifetime – many of these on a number of occasions.
On average, 2 women a week are killed by a current or former male partner.
On average, 2 women a week are killed by a current or former male partner.
One misleading statistic, which is often repeated, is that - while one in four women experience domestic violence - so do one in six men. These figures are, however, based on single incidents, of a criminal nature, and without regard to:
· severity of violence
· whether or not it was repeated - and if so, how often
· the complex pattern of overlapping abuse of various kinds
· the context in which it took place.,,,,
The Bold words are as they appear on the webpage. I’ve unlined the text clearly designed to send out a Misandry message which is false and gender discriminatory.
According to Office for National Statistics: Crime Survey (Focus on Violent Crime and Sexual Offences, 2011/12
In 2011/12 – 17 men (one every 21 days) died at the hands of their partner or ex partner compared with 88 women (one every four days)
In other words, 1 man every 3 weeks and 1 woman every 4 days (not quite 2 women a week) as Women’s Aid claim are killed by their partner or ex-partner. Irrespective of Gender, these figures are far too high and any murder is immoral.
However, Women’s Aid clearly claim that all the murderers of female partners are male. As far as I can ascertain, the gender of the suspects have not been recorded. Although it would be commonly accepted that most suspects would indeed be male, it is likely that there would be some same-sex relationships included in the fatalities.
By slightly manipulating the crime statistics, Women’s Aid attempt to make male mistreatment of females look worse than it is without acknowledging women can also behave in such an evil manner.
Women’s Aid accept the 1 in 4 women statistic, but challenge the 1 in 6 men statistic although they both come from the same source! How bizarre!
How can it be misleading ? Hmmmmmm? Does that make the 1 in 4 women misleading by the same token?
They claim that it’s not reliable because it refers to a single incident but the same criteria is used to measure both genders. The real truth is that it promotes a reality that Women’s Aid doesn’t want to admit to!
There is over 30 years of academic research available that offers confirmation that a similar proportion of men and women are domestic violence victims. I've said it before and I will say it again, Domestic Violence affects everyone irrespective of Gender - it is never a gender issue alone. This message has been silenced because it doesn't match the misandrist agenda of many feminists.
A lot of Misandrists love to claim that 95% of domestic violence victims are woman.
This originated from the USA back in November 1994, nearly 20 years ago and came from the following:
90-95% of domestic violence victims are women. (Bureau of Justice Statistics Selected Findings: Violence between Intimates (NCJ-. 149259), November 1994.)
Strange how the sampling or method used to arrive at this extortionate percentage has been lost over the period of time! Also strange is that fact that academic reports which challenged this bias have been ignored, although accepted at the time as addressing an inaccuracy.
Professor Murray Straus’ epic and ground-breaking paper, ‘The Controversy Over Domestic Violence by Women 1999 ‘ can still be found online if you look hard enough:
In this paper Professor Straus writes of the attacks against him and his team because of their findings:
In the mid-1970s my colleagues and I made the disturbing discovery that
women physically assaulted partners in marital, cohabiting, and dating relationships as often as men assaulted their partners (Steinmetz, 1978; Straus, 1997; Straus, Gelles, & Steinnietz, 1980). This finding caused me and my former colleague, Suzanne Steinmetz, to be excommunicated as feminists. Neither of us has accepted that sentence, but it remains in force. So when Salman Rushdie was condemned to death for his heresy, we may have felt even more empathy than most people because we had also experienced many threats, including a bomb threat.
As a result of the women's movement, the traditional reluctance of the police to become involved in "domestics" (Kaufman Kantor & Straus, 1990; Straus, 1977) has changed. In most jurisdictions in the United States, state laws or police regulations now require or recommend arrest. However, consistent with the greater injury rate for women, these laws and regulations may state or imply a male offender. Although on average, when there is an injury, this is correct, it denies male victims equal protection under the law. In fact, there are a growing number of complaints that attempts by men to obtain police protection may result in the man being arrested (Cook, 1997). That ironic situation is an additional reason that men are reluctant to call for police protection. The main reason is one already discussed in explaining gender differences in police statistics: The injury rate is much lower when the offender is a woman and there is therefore less perceived need to call for protection. The fact that assault is a legal and moral crime, regardless of whether there is injury, is lost from view.
Men are also less likely to call the police, even when there is injury, because, like women, they feel shame about disclosing family violence. But for many men, the shame is compounded by the shame of not being able to keep their wives under control. Among this group, a "real man" would be able to keep her under control. Moreover, many police share these same traditional gender role expectations. This adds to the legal and regulatory presumption That is, they know they are likely to be able to get away with it. As in the case of other crimes, the probability of a woman assaulting her partner is strongly influenced by what she thinks she can get away with (Gelles & Straus, 1988).
In the last paragraph, Straus touches on how the ‘90-95% of domestic violence victims are women’ statement was arrived at. He expounds it further explaining how the figure is derived .
.. “Crime studies, without exception, show much higher rates of assault by men, often 90% by men. Crime studies also find a prevalence rate (for both men and women) that is a small fraction of the rate of assaults found by family conflict studies. The difference in prevalence rates and in gender differences between the two types of studies probably occur because crime studies deal with only the small part of all domestic assaults that the participants experience as a crime, such as assaults which result in an injury serious enough to need medical attention, or assaults by a former partner. These occur relatively rarely and tend to be assaults by men. “
….Other reasons why assaults by women are rare in police statistics probably include the reluctance of men to admit that they cannot "handle their wives." In addition, although police in some jurisdictions are now arresting female offenders more than previously, analogous to their former reluctance to make arrests of husbands, they remain reluctant to make arrests in such cases
Circa 1994, the 90-95% was the given gender split which reported serious Crime assaults resulting in injury caused by an ex- partner. Back in 1994, men just didn’t report similar assaults where they had been victims and even today, 20 years later, there is a reluctance by men to do so.
The truth is out there – sometimes you just have to dig a little deeper to find it!